Logo ECIJA

    Employment relationships versus professional services: the Court reinforces the criteria for distinguishing between them

    In January 2026, the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice issued a key ruling on how to distinguish an employment relationship from the provision of professional services.

    The ruling consolidates lines of case law applicable to so-called ‘borderline cases’, which are becoming increasingly common in business models with flexible working arrangements.


    The ruling reiterates that the classification of a relationship does not depend on the name given to the contract, but on the practical reality. Legal subordination remains the key factor in distinguishing an employee from a self-employed contractor.


    Among the factors assessed by the Court are: the existence of working hours, levels of control and supervision, integration into the business structure, exclusivity, economic dependence, the use of corporate tools, and the assumption of risks inherent to the activity.


    What does this mean for your company?

    If you engage consultants, freelancers or external specialists under flexible arrangements, this ruling serves as a reminder that such arrangements could be reclassified as employment relationships if, in practice, there are clear indications of subordination or organisational integration.


    We recommend periodically reviewing the contracting structures and supervision mechanisms applicable to independent contractors, particularly where operational dynamics may blur the line between professional autonomy and employment dependency.


    See the resolution at: https://nexuspj.poder-judicial.go.cr/document/sen-1-0034-1364159

    Related professionals

    LATEST FROM #ECIJA

    Articles
    28 July 2026
    Correct handling of the upcoming public holidays: August

    Two out of three days fall at the weekend

    Read more
    Articles
    22 July 2026
    TCS Harassment Fallout Reaches BPOs Worldwide

    Violence and harassment at work are certainly not restricted to one particular geography or company.

    Read more
    Articles
    20 July 2026
    Mandatory transition to the exclusive use of electronic signatures in dealings with the IMSS

    On 16 July 2026, a new Agreement (ACDO.AS2.HCT.290626/176.P.DIR) issued by the Technical Council of the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF).

    Read more
    Articles
    16 July 2026
    Simplification of procedures with the Ministry of Labour and Social Security (STPS) – Register of Specialised Service Providers (REPSE)

    On 9 June 2026, the Agreement setting out measures to streamline procedures carried out with the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare (“STPS”) was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation.

    Read more
    News
    8 July 2026
    ECIJA approves the first Sustainable Mobility Plan for the legal sector in Spain

    The firm is making a pioneering step in the legal sector with a comprehensive mobility planning tool, in line with its corporate purpose, its environmental commitment, and the new regulatory requirements regarding sustainability

    Read more
    News
    30 June 2026
    ECIJA strengthens its team in Pamplona and consolidates its presence in Navarra with the recruitment of 20 professionals

    The initiative expands ECIJA's coverage in Navarra and incorporates a team of experts in taxation, labor law, commercial law, financial consulting, and international affairs.

    Read more
    Articles
    29 June 2026
    Paternity leave: bill aims to bring the private and public sectors into line

    Bill. File No. 25.049. Act on paternity leave in Costa Rica.

    Read more
    Articles
    29 June 2026
    Shares as executive remuneration: are they part of the salary?

    The Second Chamber examined the legal nature of corporate incentives linked to shares, specifically ‘Restricted Stock Units’ (RSU) schemes, and whether they could be included in an employee’s salary.

    Read more
    Articles
    25 June 2026
    Employment relationships versus professional services: the Court reinforces the criteria for distinguishing between them

    In January 2026, the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice issued a key ruling on how to distinguish an employment relationship from the provision of professional services.

    Read more